Re: A different type of security vulnerability

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: A different type of security vulnerability
De : mitchalsup (at) *nospam* aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 09. Aug 2024, 20:56:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <6552094d65de74108310824f2787382a@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:52:50 +0000, Stephen Fuld wrote:

MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>
If only x86 chips came out of RESET with the MMUs
already turned on.
>
>
Probably sufficient, but not necessary.
Eliminates the need for ring -1 and ring -2.

                                         Apparently Intel chips are not
vulnerable to this particular atack.
So far.....
>
>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Aug 24 * A different type of security vulnerability6Stephen Fuld
9 Aug 24 `* Re: A different type of security vulnerability5MitchAlsup1
9 Aug 24  +* Re: A different type of security vulnerability2Stephen Fuld
9 Aug 24  i`- Re: A different type of security vulnerability1MitchAlsup1
10 Aug 24  `* Re: A different type of security vulnerability2MitchAlsup1
10 Aug 24   `- Re: A different type of security vulnerability1MitchAlsup1

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal