Re: Quite a spectacular security bug

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Quite a spectacular security bug
De : mitchalsup (at) *nospam* aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 14. Aug 2024, 03:28:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <55f5746c25317c9296bfcdb50c19bda0@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 22:21:00 +0000, John Dallman wrote:

In article <dd966b72384e88feb501ba3addfbc246@www.novabbs.org>,
mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) wrote:
>
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:40:00 +0000, John Dallman wrote:
A company that doesn't find that kind of flaw is thoroughly
capable of missing a memory management problem.

Missing something as easy as that makes one wonder about how much
other stuff testing missed ??
>
Exactly. Thinking something is too simple to need testing is a
fundamental error.
We generally budgeted:: engineering$$ == verification$$

>
John

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Aug 24 * Quite a spectacular security bug7John Dallman
13 Aug 24 `* Re: Quite a spectacular security bug6MitchAlsup1
13 Aug 24  +- Re: Quite a spectacular security bug1Thomas Koenig
13 Aug 24  `* Re: Quite a spectacular security bug4John Dallman
13 Aug 24   `* Re: Quite a spectacular security bug3MitchAlsup1
14 Aug 24    `* Re: Quite a spectacular security bug2John Dallman
14 Aug 24     `- Re: Quite a spectacular security bug1MitchAlsup1

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal