Re: Decrement And Branch

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:29:11 GMT, Anton Ertl wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
>

Note that I was referring to the decrement-down-to-minus-1 form, as
opposed to the decrement-down-to-zero form.

 
I guess what you want to point out is ...

That the example I gave will correctly handle the case where the loop
count is initially zero (fall out the bottom without executing the loop
once), without the need for a separate test.