Sujet : Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
De : jgd (at) *nospam* cix.co.uk (John Dallman)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 30. Aug 2024, 16:42:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <memo.20240830164247.19028y@jgd.cix.co.uk>
References : 1
In article <
2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>,
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote:
ISVs get sceptical about that, because it's generating code they
have not tested.
Yes, that thinking seems to be a result of C/C++ compiler
shenanigans. People advocating "optimization" based on the
assumption that undefined behaviour does not happen have
suggested that I should keep compiler versions around that
compile my source code as I expect it.
Plain old compiler bugs, introduced while fixing other ones, are quite
enough to make me assume that I'll find problems on each change of
compiler. I have had a manager in a very large software company assure me
that it was impossible for them to add bugs while making fixes. His
technical people corrected him immediately, because I'd just laughed.
John