Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
De : tkoenig (at) *nospam* netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 31. Aug 2024, 10:59:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vaum13$v11m$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
John Dallman <jgd@cix.co.uk> schrieb:
In article <2024Aug29.135124@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>,
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote:
>
Concerning the demand, RISC-V has the advantage of no ARM tax (and
legal costs like those between ARM and Qualcomm over the
developments started at NUVIA)
>
True, although the market for high-performance application cores is less
price-sensitive than the market for low-performance embedded ones.

Definitely - if you have 512 GB DDR5 memory in your workstation, the
cost of the CPU itself is a relatively small fraction.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Aug 24 * Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...9John Dallman
28 Aug 24 +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Thomas Koenig
29 Aug 24 i+- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Anton Ertl
30 Aug 24 i`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig
29 Aug 24 `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5Anton Ertl
30 Aug 24  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...4John Dallman
31 Aug 24   `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24    `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Anton Ertl
31 Aug 24     `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal