Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> schrieb:
I'm all in favour of temporarily having checks for overflow (and
other errors) during debugging, but I am sceptical to having
distinct debug/release builds. It encourages people to use debug
builds during development, bug hunting and testing, then when all
looks good they switch to release build and deploy it. I prefer a
single build, and enable run-time checks on parts of it if and when
necessary.
Wise man once said...
# It is absurd to make elaborate security checks on debugging runs,
# when no trust is put in the results, and then remove them in
# production runs, when an erroneous result could be expensive or
# disastrous. What would we think of a sailing enthusiast who wears
# his lifejacket when training on dry land, but takes it off as soon
# as he goes to sea?
(C.A.R. Hoare, in "Hints on Programming Language Desin)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.