Sujet : Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
De : tkoenig (at) *nospam* netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 05. Sep 2024, 15:49:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbcge6$cd1g$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Anton Ertl <
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> schrieb:
In either case, treating the C standard as agreement is nonsense.
That's a good summary of your attitude. Using this argument with
compiler writers will get you precisely nowhere, but you already
have experience with that.
Now for a challenge: Try to specify the behavior of any piece of
undefined behavior whose treatment by compilers you object to in
a way that a compiler writer can follow it. Think that it could
be published as an annex to the standard.
What could this be?