Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 09. Sep 2024, 15:24:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86le01j6y4.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>
mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) writes:
>
So:
# define memcpy memomve
>
Incidentally, if one wants to do this, it's advisable to write
>
 #undef  memcpy
>
before the #define of memcpy.
>
and move forward with life--for the 2 extra cycles memmove costs
it saves everyone long term grief.
>
Is it two extra cycles?  Here are some data points from
<2017Sep23.174313@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>:
>
Haswell (Core i7-4790K), glibc 2.19
   1    8   32   64  128  256  512   1K  2K    4K   8K  16K block size
  14   14   15   15   17   30   48   85  150  281  570 1370 memmove
  15   16   13   16   19   32   48   86  161  327  631 1420 memcpy
>
Skylake (Core i5-6600K), glibc 2.19
   1    8   32   64  128  256  512   1K  2K    4K   8K  16K block size
  14   14   14   14   15   27   43   77  147  305  573 1417 memmove
  13   14   10   12   14   27   46   85  165  313  607 1350 memcpy
>
Zen (Ryzen 5 1600X), glibc 2.24
   1    8   32   64  128  256  512   1K  2K    4K   8K  16K block size
  16   16   16   17   32   43   66  107  177  328  601 1225 memmove
  13   13   14   13   38   49   73  116  188  336  610 1233 memcpy
>
I don't see a consistent speedup of memcpy over memmove here.
>
However, when one uses memcpy(&var,ptr,8) or the like to perform an
unaligned access, gcc transforms this into a load (or store) without
the redefinition of memcpy, but into much slower code with the
redefinition (i.e., when using memmove instead of memcpy).
>
Simply replacing memcpy() by memmove() of course will always
work, but there might be negative consequences beyond a cost
of 2 extra cycles -- for example, if a negative stride is
better performing than a positive stride, but the nature
of the compaction forces memmove() to always take the slower
choice.
>
If the two memory blocks don't overlap, memmove() can use the
fastest stride.

It /could/ use the fastest stride.  Whether it /does/ use the
fastest stride is a different question (and one that may have
different answers on different platforms).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Aug 24 * Computer architects leaving Intel...529Thomas Koenig
27 Aug 24 +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Michael S
27 Aug 24 +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Stephen Fuld
27 Aug 24 `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...526John Dallman
28 Aug 24  +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...519BGB
28 Aug 24  i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...518MitchAlsup1
28 Aug 24  i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...517BGB
28 Aug 24  i  +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Robert Finch
28 Aug 24  i  i`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1BGB
28 Aug 24  i  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...514MitchAlsup1
29 Aug 24  i   `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...513BGB
29 Aug 24  i    +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...501MitchAlsup1
29 Aug 24  i    i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...500BGB
30 Aug 24  i    i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...489John Dallman
30 Aug 24  i    i i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...11Thomas Koenig
30 Aug 24  i    i ii+- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Michael S
30 Aug 24  i    i ii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...8Anton Ertl
30 Aug 24  i    i iii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Michael S
30 Aug 24  i    i iiii`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Anton Ertl
30 Aug 24  i    i iii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5John Dallman
30 Aug 24  i    i iii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...4Brett
30 Aug 24  i    i iii  +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1John Dallman
2 Sep 24  i    i iii  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Terje Mathisen
2 Sep 24  i    i iii   `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig
30 Aug 24  i    i ii`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1BGB
30 Aug 24  i    i i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...477Anton Ertl
30 Aug 24  i    i i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...301John Dallman
30 Aug 24  i    i i i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...300David Brown
30 Aug 24  i    i i i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...292Anton Ertl
30 Aug 24  i    i i i i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...291Bernd Linsel
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...289Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i  +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...287Bernd Linsel
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i   +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i   +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i   i`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Bernd Linsel
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i   `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...283Anton Ertl
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i    +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...278Thomas Koenig
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i    i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...157Bernd Linsel
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i    ii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...153MitchAlsup1
1 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...152Stephen Fuld
2 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...151Terje Mathisen
2 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...150Stephen Fuld
3 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...139David Brown
3 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...108Stephen Fuld
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...107David Brown
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...103Terje Mathisen
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...101David Brown
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii ii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...97jseigh
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...96David Brown
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...95Brett
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Thomas Koenig
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...8BGB
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...7MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...6David Brown
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5Niklas Holsti
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i   `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...4David Brown
6 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i    `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3BGB
6 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i     `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2David Brown
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i      `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1BGB
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...83David Brown
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...82Terje Mathisen
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...79David Brown
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Thomas Koenig
7 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i ii`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Tim Rentsch
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...74Terje Mathisen
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i ii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...16David Brown
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...15Terje Mathisen
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...12David Brown
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...11Brett
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5Terje Mathisen
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...4Brett
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Michael S
11 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i i i`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Brett
11 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i i `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Terje Mathisen
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5David Brown
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i  +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Anton Ertl
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i  i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2David Brown
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i  i `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Stefan Monnier
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i  `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1BGB
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Michael S
10 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii  `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Michael S
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i ii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...45Bernd Linsel
6 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii+- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1David Brown
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Terje Mathisen
9 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iiii`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Tim Rentsch
14 Sep15:08  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...41Kent Dickey
14 Sep15:26  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...32Anton Ertl
14 Sep21:11  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...29MitchAlsup1
14 Sep21:26  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...28Thomas Koenig
15 Sep17:50  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...27David Brown
16 Sep09:17  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii  +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5Thomas Koenig
16 Sep14:45  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii  i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...4David Brown
16 Sep22:15  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii  i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Thomas Koenig
17 Sep03:49  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii  i  +- Re: Upwards and downwards compatible, Computer architects leaving Intel...1John Levine
17 Sep11:15  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii  i  `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1David Brown
16 Sep10:37  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...21Terje Mathisen
16 Sep14:48  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii   `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...20David Brown
16 Sep15:04  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii    +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...14Michael S
17 Sep08:07  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii ii    `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5Terje Mathisen
15 Sep06:42  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2BGB
14 Sep21:00  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Thomas Koenig
16 Sep03:32  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i iii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...5Tim Rentsch
6 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i ii+* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Tim Rentsch
7 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i ii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...9Chris M. Thomasson
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2MitchAlsup1
7 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii iii  `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Tim Rentsch
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii ii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Thomas Koenig
6 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii i`- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1jseigh
13 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   ii `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2Stephen Fuld
3 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...30Stefan Monnier
3 Sep 24  i    i i i i    iii   `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...10Terje Mathisen
31 Aug 24  i    i i i i    ii`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3Thomas Koenig
1 Sep 24  i    i i i i    i`* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...120David Brown
1 Sep 24  i    i i i i    +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...3John Dallman
3 Sep 24  i    i i i i    `- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1Stefan Monnier
30 Aug 24  i    i i i +- Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...1MitchAlsup1
30 Aug 24  i    i i i +* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...4Stefan Monnier
30 Aug 24  i    i i i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...2John Dallman
8 Sep 24  i    i i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...175Tim Rentsch
30 Aug 24  i    i `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...10MitchAlsup1
31 Aug 24  i    `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...11Paul A. Clayton
29 Aug 24  `* Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...6Anton Ertl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal