Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 10. Sep 2024, 21:04:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbq57c$33j9p$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/10/2024 7:51 AM, jseigh wrote:
[...]
This older code of mine is using Relacy, but you should get the "jist" of it:
________________________________
#include <iostream>
#include <cstddef>
#include <relacy/relacy.hpp>
#define CT_THREAD_N 5
#define CT_WORK_N 3
#define CT_PRODUCER_WORK_N 5
#define CT_CONSUMER_WORK_N 2
#define CT_DISTRIBUTE_WORK_N CT_THREAD_N
// Notes:
// Using spin backoff for waits as of now
// Need to slow-path it with with kernel waits
// Need to refine the per-node backoff
// humm...
#define CT_PENDING ((ct_xchg_lifo_ver_001::work*)(0xDEADBEEF))
static unsigned long g_stats_local_work = 0;
static unsigned long g_stats_foreign_work = 0;
struct ct_xchg_lifo_ver_001
{
     // simulate some work...
     struct work
     {
         rl::atomic<work*> m_next;
         VAR_T(unsigned long) m_work;
         VAR_T(unsigned long) m_tidx;
         work(unsigned long tidx)
             : m_next(CT_PENDING),
             m_work(0),
             m_tidx(tidx)
         {
         }
         ~work()
         {
             RL_ASSERT(VAR(m_work) == 1);
         }
         // no data races on m_work!
         void execute_work(unsigned long tidx)
         {
             VAR(m_work) += 1;
             unsigned long local_tidx = VAR(m_tidx);
             if (local_tidx != tidx)
             {
                 g_stats_foreign_work += 1;
                 /*
                 std::cout << "foriegn work detected "
                 << local_tidx
                 << " -> "
                 << tidx
                 << std::endl;
                 */
             }
             else
             {
                 g_stats_local_work += 1;
                 /*
                 std::cout << "local work detected "
                 << local_tidx
                 << " -> "
                 << tidx
                 << std::endl;
                 */
             }
         }
         // this is the pending node logic...
         work* get_next()
         {
             work* next = m_next.load(rl::mo_relaxed, $);
             while (next == CT_PENDING)
             {
                 rl::backoff();
                 next = m_next.load(rl::mo_relaxed, $);
             }
             return next;
         }
         static void process(work* cur, unsigned long tidx)
         {
             // must not be pending!
             RL_ASSERT(cur != CT_PENDING);
             // process work nodes...
             while (cur)
             {
                 // do real work _before_ the pending logic
                 // this is highly beneficial... Big time!
                 cur->execute_work(tidx);
                 // get the next work node.
                 cur = cur->get_next();
             }
         }
         // dump worked on nodes...
         static void destroy(work* cur, unsigned long tidx)
         {
             // no pending work shall be destroyed!
             RL_ASSERT(cur != CT_PENDING);
             while (cur)
             {
                 work* next = cur->m_next.load(rl::mo_relaxed, $);
                 // no pending work shall be destroyed!
                 RL_ASSERT(next != CT_PENDING);
                 delete cur;
                 cur = next;
             }
         }
     };
     rl::atomic<work*> m_head;
     ct_xchg_lifo_ver_001()
         : m_head(nullptr)
     {
     }
     ~ct_xchg_lifo_ver_001()
     {
         RL_ASSERT(!m_head.load(rl::mo_relaxed, $));
     }
     void push(work* w)
     {
         // this completes the pending logic...
         w->m_next.store(CT_PENDING, rl::mo_relaxed, $);
         work* head = m_head.exchange(w, rl::mo_release, $);
         w->m_next.store(head, rl::mo_relaxed, $);
     }
     work* flush()
     {
         return m_head.exchange(nullptr, rl::mo_acquire, $);
     }
};
// A test of a simple way to distribute work
// Using the ct_xchg_lifo_ver_001 API
template<typename T, std::size_t T_N>
struct ct_distribute_ver_001
{
     T m_table[T_N];
     typedef typename T::work work;
     void push(work* w, unsigned int tidx)
     {
         T& t = m_table[tidx % T_N];
         t.push(w);
     }
     work* pop(unsigned int tidx)
     {
         for (std::size_t i = 0; i < T_N; ++i)
         {
             T& t = m_table[(i + tidx) % T_N];
             work* w = t.flush();
             if (w) return w;
         }
         return nullptr;
     }
};
// Relacy Test Unit...
struct ct_relacy_test_fun
     : rl::test_suite<ct_relacy_test_fun, CT_THREAD_N>
{
     typedef ct_distribute_ver_001<
         ct_xchg_lifo_ver_001,
         CT_DISTRIBUTE_WORK_N
     > distribute;
     distribute m_work;
     void thread(unsigned int tidx)
     {
         for (unsigned long wi = 0; wi < CT_WORK_N; ++wi)
         {
             for (unsigned long i = 0; i < CT_PRODUCER_WORK_N; ++i)
             {
                 distribute::work* w = new distribute::work(tidx);
                 m_work.push(w, tidx);
             }
             for (unsigned long i = 0; i < CT_CONSUMER_WORK_N; ++i)
             {
                 distribute::work* w = m_work.pop(tidx);
                 distribute::work::process(w, tidx);
                 distribute::work::destroy(w, tidx);
             }
         }
     }
};
int
main()
{
     std::cout << "Exchange LIFO Container Experiment ver:0.0.2\n";
     std::cout << "Relacy Unit Test ver:0.0.2\n";
     std::cout << "by: Chris M. Thomasson\n";
     std::cout << "__________________________________\n" << std::endl;
     {
         rl::test_params p;
         p.iteration_count = 1000000;
         //p.execution_depth_limit = 33333;
         //p.search_type = rl::sched_bound;
         //p.search_type = rl::fair_full_search_scheduler_type;
         //p.search_type = rl::fair_context_bound_scheduler_type;
         std::cout << "Executing Relacy Unit Test...\n";
         std::cout << "__________________________________" << std::endl;
         rl::simulate<ct_relacy_test_fun>(p);
         std::cout << "\nwork load "
             << g_stats_local_work
             << ", "
             << g_stats_foreign_work
             << std::endl;
     }
     return 0;
}
_________________________________

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Sep 24 * arm ldxr/stxr vs cas58jseigh
2 Sep 24 +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas4Chris M. Thomasson
2 Sep 24 i`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas3Chris M. Thomasson
2 Sep 24 i `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2jseigh
2 Sep 24 i  `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Sep 24 +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas50MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 i+* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas3Chris M. Thomasson
5 Sep 24 ii`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 ii `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Sep 24 i`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas46jseigh
5 Sep 24 i +- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Anton Ertl
5 Sep 24 i `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas44MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 i  `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas43Chris M. Thomasson
5 Sep 24 i   `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas42jseigh
6 Sep 24 i    +- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1MitchAlsup1
6 Sep 24 i    +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas20Chris M. Thomasson
6 Sep 24 i    i`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas19MitchAlsup1
7 Sep 24 i    i `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas18jseigh
8 Sep 24 i    i  `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas17Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i   `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas16Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i    `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas15Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i     `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas14MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i    i      +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas4Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i      i+- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i      i`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2jseigh
8 Sep 24 i    i      i `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i      `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas9Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i       +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas6Michael S
8 Sep 24 i    i       i+- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i    i       i+- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i    i       i`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas3Michael S
9 Sep 24 i    i       i `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2Michael S
9 Sep 24 i    i       i  `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Michael S
8 Sep 24 i    i       +- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i    i       `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i    `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas20Terje Mathisen
9 Sep 24 i     +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas11jseigh
9 Sep 24 i     i+* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas6Chris M. Thomasson
10 Sep 24 i     ii`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas5jseigh
10 Sep 24 i     ii `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas4Chris M. Thomasson
10 Sep 24 i     ii  `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas3jseigh
11 Sep 24 i     ii   `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2Chris M. Thomasson
11 Sep 24 i     ii    `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Sep 24 i     i`* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas4Terje Mathisen
10 Sep 24 i     i `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas3jseigh
10 Sep 24 i     i  +- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Sep 24 i     i  `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i     +- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Sep 24 i     `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas7Paul A. Clayton
11 Sep 24 i      +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2Chris M. Thomasson
11 Sep 24 i      i`- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Sep 24 i      +* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2jseigh
11 Sep 24 i      i`- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Sep 24 i      `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2Stefan Monnier
12 Sep 24 i       `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas3jseigh
11 Sep 24  `* Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas2jseigh
11 Sep 24   `- Re: arm ldxr/stxr vs cas1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal