Sujet : Re: Tonights Tradeoff
De : cr88192 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (BGB)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 12. Sep 2024, 09:21:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbu8bd$5k8e$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/12/2024 12:37 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
MitchAlsup1 <mitchalsup@aol.com> schrieb:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 7:00:00 +0000, BGB wrote:
>
On 9/9/2024 10:59 PM, Robert Finch wrote:
>
Still trying to grasp the virtual vector method. Been wondering if it
can be implemented using renamed registers.
>
>
I haven't really understood how it could be implemented.
But, granted, my pipeline design is relatively simplistic, and my
priority had usually been trying to make a "fast but cheap and simple"
pipeline, rather than a "clever" pipeline.
>
"Good, Fast, Cheap; choose any 2" Lee Higbe 1982.
Still beeter than "Good, Fast, Cheap: Chose one."
One can take note of all my corner-cutting...
I was mostly trying to prioritize fast and cheap, but sadly it is neither as fast nor as cheap as I would want.
Though, ironically, will put at least some of the cost blame on RISC-V, which doesn't go quite so hard on the corner cutting.
But, one can maybe argue that it is a bit much to try to push for a 64-bit ISA that only natively has 32-bit integer multiply, ...
Though, this is not to say that other possible implementations couldn't try to do everything "properly".
Tonights Tradeoff
Re: Tonights Tradeoff