Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?

On 20/09/2024 17:21, Brett wrote:

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:

On 20/09/2024 07:46, Thomas Koenig wrote:

Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> schrieb:

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> schrieb:
>

Quantum mechanics is high IQ bullshit to make professors look important.

>
You need quantum mechanics to describe solid-state electronics
(or all atoms, for that matter).

>
Type “quantum mechanics criticism” and variants into Google and have at it.

>
I've read enough crackpot theories already, thank you, I don't need
any more.

>
Quantum mechanics describes the rules that give structure to atoms and
molecules.  On a larger scale, those structures build up to explain
spherical planets.  But we know the earth is flat.  Therefore, quantum
mechanics is bullshit.  What more evidence could you want?

  Yup, you just explained the Einstein argument, just like I said.
 

I think you are somewhat confused.
I can't claim to understand every argument Einstein made, but I am quite certain he was not a flat-earther.  Nor did he think quantum mechanics was "bullshit" - his Nobel prize on the photoelectric effect was a stepping-stone in the development of the theory of quantum mechanics.