Sujet : Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
De : jgd (at) *nospam* cix.co.uk (John Dallman)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 20. Sep 2024, 21:06:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <memo.20240920210657.19028B@jgd.cix.co.uk>
References : 1
In article <
vcgpqt$gndp$1@dont-email.me>,
david.brown@hesbynett.no (David
Brown) wrote:
Even a complete amateur can notice time mismatches of 10 ms in a
musical context, so for a professional this does not surprise me.
I don't know of any human endeavour that requires lower latency or
more precise timing than music.
A friend used to work on set-top boxes, with fairly slow hardware. They
had demonstrations of two different ways of handling inability to keep up
with the data stream:
- Keeping the picture on schedule, and dropping a few milliseconds
of sound.
- Dropping a frame of the picture, and keeping the sound on-track.
Potential customers always thought they wanted the first approach, until
they watched the demos. Human vision fakes a lot of what we "see" at the
best of times, bit hearing is more sensitive to glitches.
John