Sujet : Re: Microsoft makes a lot of money, Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
De : tkoenig (at) *nospam* netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 24. Sep 2024, 18:38:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcute7$39icl$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
MitchAlsup1 <
mitchalsup@aol.com> schrieb:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 0:53:14 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
Anybody producing large amounts of high-quality, complex textual
material > (e.g. technical documentation) is inevitably going to
have to move beyond WYSIWYG tools and adopt some kind of markup
system.
>
I disagree.
>
Word is just fine as long as all your drawings are *.jpg.
>
What feature do you think is missing ??
I intensely dislike jpeg drawings in Word. They blow up the
file size and are still limited in resolution. Vector files
are better.
Hmm... a feature that Word has added in the last decade, that is
quite good: It is now possible to import *.svg files.
I have found a convoluted way for creating graphics: Write a
Fortran program that creates PostScript for output. Convert the
PostScript into PDF with a suitable tool, Adobe or ghostscript.
Open the PDF with Inkscape, adjust the bounding box, and save it
as *.svg. Import into Word (or PowerPoint). Ready!
Directly importing PDF into Word is a nightmare, you get blocky
graphics, and nothing works if somebody else uses a different
PDF viewer.