Re: is Vax addressing sane today

In article<vcpidc$29e51$1@dont-email.me>,
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>  wrote:

Kent Dickey <kegs@provalid.com> schrieb:
>

Trapping on overflow is basically useless other than as a debug aid,
which clearly nobody values.

>
I disagree.
>
Look at the sanitizer libraries, which insert runtime checks for
integer overflow - having less overhead for these would definitely
be a plus.
>
See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html
or
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerFlags#run-time-fla
gs
.

>
Not valuing something just means no one is spending a lot of time/effort
on it. Decimal math is not valued--but you can still do it, it just
has no special instructions on most architectures to make it fast/easy.
And as I've pointed out, trapping on integer overflow is clearly not
valued--on x86, where INTO exists, GCC and Clang do not use it.