Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:54:54 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 0:50:15 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
 

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 18:45:54 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 7:23:59 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

>
Bell’s Theorem offered a way to test for those, and the tests (there
have been several of them so far, done in several different ways)
show that such “hidden variables” cannot exist.

>
Do not exist, there remains no evidence that they cannot exist.

>
The large collection of tests of Bell’s theorem is that evidence.

 
There is still that ~1:peta chance of some phenomena we have not yet
measured to upend the inequality.

Sure. Every time somebody does one test, other scientists look at that and
say “but what if...”. So someone else thinks up a new test that approaches
things from a different direction. That’s how science is done.

Let’s just say that so many tests have been done of Bell’s Theorem now,
that nobody is likely to build a scientific career out of continuing to
question it.