Sujet : Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
De : ggtgp (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Brett)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 30. Sep 2024, 05:01:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdd7rj$23l66$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
John Dallman <
jgd@cix.co.uk> wrote:
In article <vdc5po$1reaa$1@dont-email.me>, ggtgp@yahoo.com (Brett) wrote:
Well then, Go take a look at the Structures Atom Model and tell me
what you think.
https://structuredatom.org
It's a re-invention of the "nuclear electrons" idea that was current
through the 1920s, and seems to have the same problems.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_the_neutron#Problems_of_the_nu
clear_electrons_hypothesis>
John
That is just another cloud model. SAM has actual structure that explains
attachment angles and should explain hyperfine structure properties better.
The hyperfine structure looks like just a collection of SWAG formulas, so
why should your atom model even matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfine_structure