Re: Misc: BGBCC targeting RV64G, initial results...

On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 5:40:02 +0000, BGB wrote:

On 10/8/2024 3:48 PM, MitchAlsup1 wrote:

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:06:34 +0000, BGB wrote:

>
At present, there isn't anything to detect voids directly, but, density
percentage is easy to detect:
   (100*count)/(max-min)

     defaults_in_a_row > 3 words.
---------------

To some amount, everything is heuristics.
>
I guess also possible is to make it such that a the required density (to
avoid split) is correlated to table size.
>
Say (table size, minimum density):
   128, 75%
   256, 80%
   512, 85%
   1024, 90%
   2048, 95%

     defaults_in_a_row > 3 words.