Sujet : Re: x86S Specification
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 23. Oct 2024, 00:46:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf9dh9$1mkkd$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:16:34 -0500, BGB wrote:
In this case, the Apple situation makes more sense. They have jumped
MacOS from x86 to ARM, without loosing all of their existing software
base, by running a userland emulator that "doesn't suck".
Seems like the Apple platform has less need for third-party addons that
intrude into the kernel, simply because it has a smaller choice of apps
anyway.
For example, anticheat mechanisms for online games. Fortnite is one I have
seen mentioned, that cannot work with the x86 emulation offered by
Windows-on-ARM. Presumbly this is not a problem on the Mac because
Fortnite is simply unavailable on the Mac.
Re: x86S Specification
Re: x86S Specification
