Re: old phones, x86S Specification

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: old phones, x86S Specification
De : gneuner2 (at) *nospam* comcast.net (George Neuner)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 25. Oct 2024, 03:28:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <rrtlhj9qno0pvl4mfocc0al6603br9no4k@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:31:17 -0000 (UTC), John Levine
<johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

According to George Neuner  <gneuner2@comcast.net>:
I used an LG flip phone from 2008..2020.  Prior to that I had a Nokia
"stick" from 1995.  Before that I had a Motorola flip phone from early
80's that was on my parents' plan.
>
Only reasons I have ever upgraded was because carriers changed service
requirements: 2G->3G, 3G->4G.  I have never had to replace a phone
because it was damaged.
>
I generally get a new phone because the battery gets tired, and it's been a
while since anyone made phones you would want to use that have removable
batteries.

On average I get several days to a charge.  Bluetooth, GPS and
cellular data are kept off unless I need them.

As it happens, my home is in a signal node: I get 1..2 bars and voice
calling is fine, but data throughput is pathetic to nonexistant unless
I go out of the roof or across the street.

So I have the phone set to use (trusted!) WiFi connections whenever in
range, and I keep cellular data turned off unless there is no WiFi
available.  In this area, I can use Xfinity WiFi many places, so there
is little need for cellular data.

Turning off cell and using WiFi calling doesn't seem to save much
power, but turning off cell data where WiFi is available seems to save
a lot.

YMMV, it probably varies considerably by phone.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Oct 24 * Re: x86S Specification30BGB
22 Oct 24 +* Re: x86S Specification27MitchAlsup1
22 Oct 24 i+* Re: x86S Specification12John Levine
22 Oct 24 ii+* Re: x86S Specification3BGB
22 Oct 24 iii+- Re: x86S Specification1John Dallman
23 Oct 24 iii`- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 ii`* Re: x86S Specification8Anton Ertl
22 Oct 24 ii +* Re: x86S Specification2John Dallman
23 Oct 24 ii i`- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 ii +* Re: x86S Specification3BGB
22 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
25 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: x86S Specification1BGB
22 Oct 24 ii `* Re: x86S Specification2BGB
23 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i+- Re: x86S Specification1BGB
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: x86S Specification13George Neuner
23 Oct 24 i `* Re: x86S Specification12MitchAlsup1
24 Oct 24 i  `* Re: x86S Specification11George Neuner
25 Oct 24 i   `* Re: old phones, x86S Specification10John Levine
25 Oct 24 i    +* Re: old phones, x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
25 Oct 24 i    i`- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1BGB
25 Oct 24 i    +* Re: old phones, x86S Specification4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i    i`* Re: old phones, x86S Specification3John Levine
25 Oct 24 i    i +- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1John Levine
26 Oct 24 i    i `- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1Michael S
25 Oct 24 i    +- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1George Neuner
25 Oct 24 i    `* Re: old phones, x86S Specification2yeti
25 Oct 24 i     `- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1Robert Finch
22 Oct 24 `* Re: x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
22 Oct 24  `- Re: x86S Specification1BGB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal