Sujet : Re: Memory ordering
De : anton (at) *nospam* mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 15. Nov 2024, 18:27:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID : <2024Nov15.182737@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : xrn 10.11
jseigh <
jseigh_es00@xemaps.com> writes:
Anybody doing that sort of programming, i.e. lock-free or distributed
algorithms, who can't handle weakly consistent memory models, shouldn't
be doing that sort of programming in the first place.
Do you have any argument that supports this claim.
Strongly consistent memory won't help incompetence.
Strong words to hide lack of arguments?
- anton
-- 'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.' Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>