Sujet : Re: Signetics 25120 WOM
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.archDate : 23. Nov 2024, 22:35:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhthr2$1sd5r$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/20/2024 9:27 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2024-11-21, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/20/2024 6:18 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:04:28 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
On 11/20/2024 3:55 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On 20 Nov 2024 19:38:44 -0400, Mike Spencer wrote:
>
The requirement for "a six foot fan 1/2 inch from the package" is a
potential downside of the 25120 ...
>
Chucking away data does increase entropy. This makes things hotter.
>
Doing nothing makes things hotter?
>
Discarding information is not “doing nothing”.
>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_computing>
>
So, request denied can be plotted?
Sure. Check your local government for a file of
Freedom of Information requests.
No shit! lol. ;^)
Signetics 25120 WOM
Re: Signetics 25120 WOM