Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:59:02 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:Oh yeah. Weak order has the "ability" to _loosen_ the beat a little, allowing for various interesting optimizations. Akin to getting a fast lock/obstruction/wait-free setup running highly efficient even under very heavy artificial load, scale for sure, ala RCU with its read-mostly like things, workload types RCU loves reads...... A song to go with it:
On 11/18/2024 3:34 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:Defaulting to Strongly_Ordered is even worse.>>
>
Don't tell me you want all of std::memory_order_* to default to
std::memory_order_seq_cst? If your on a system that only has seq_cst and
nothing else, okay, but not on other weaker (memory order) systems,
right?
defaulting a relaxed to a seq_cst is a bit much.... ;^o
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.