What do we call non-pipelined designs?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : What do we call non-pipelined designs?
De : m.delete (at) *nospam* this.bitsnbites.eu (Marcus)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 08. Dec 2024, 23:10:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj55g7$1m45$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
I usually (and simplistically) divide CPU designs (implementations) into
two main categories:
- Pipelined
- Non-pipelined
Of course, there is a sliding scale at play, but let's not get into that
debate.
My question is: What is the best name for non-pipelined designs?
I'm thinking about CPU:s that transition through several states (one
clock cycle after another) when executing a single instruction (e.g.
FETCH + DECODE + EXECUTE), and where instruction and data typically
share the same memory interface.
/Marcus

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Dec 24 * What do we call non-pipelined designs?9Marcus
9 Dec 24 +* Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?7MitchAlsup1
9 Dec 24 i+* Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Dec 24 ii+- Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?1David Schultz
10 Dec 24 ii`- Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?1MitchAlsup1
9 Dec 24 i+- Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?1BGB
14 Dec 24 i`* Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?2Marcus
15 Dec 24 i `- Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?1MitchAlsup1
9 Dec 24 `- Re: What do we call non-pipelined designs?1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal