Sujet : Re: Cost of handling misaligned access
De : tkoenig (at) *nospam* netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 04. Feb 2025, 21:48:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vntufn$20obm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Scott Lurndal <
scott@slp53.sl.home> schrieb:
mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) writes:
almost 1000 cycles just to call a subroutine !!!
>
Lots of thinigs teh architects got wrong in there.....
>
While true, it's easy to say in retrospect after forty+
years of advancements in silicon design and technology.
>
Comparing to the CISC architectures of the 60s and 70s,
it's not horrible.
Was there any other CISC architecture that even came close?
Almot 1000 cycles really sounds excessive.
Re: Cost of handling misaligned access
Re: Fun with a Vax, Cost of handling misaligned access