Re: MSI interrupts

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: MSI interrupts
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 04. Apr 2025, 06:19:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsnq4d$2kcea$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/26/2025 1:22 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 3/26/2025 7:57 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
In article <jwv4izfncov.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>,
Stefan Monnier  <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
Leaving aside the unchecked boundary conditions I highlighted
above, there are other questions that this raises.  You
mentioned that the ESM stuff can use up to 8 cache lines in a
single atomic "event"; let's count how many this code may
encounter:
>
1. `from` may point to a cache line
2. `to` may point to a different cache line.
3. Does your architecture use a stack?  What sort of alignment
    criteria do you impose?   At first blush, it seems to me that
    the pointers `from_next`, `from_prev`, and `to_next` could be
    on the stack and if so, will be on at least one cache line,
    and possibly 2, if the call frame for `MoveElement` spans
    more than one.  Of course, it's impossible to say when this
    is compiled, but maybe you require that the stack is always
    aligned to a cache line boundary or something.  Or maybe
    these are all in registers and it's fine.
>
AFAIK the stack accesses will use normal loads that won't be tracked for
conflicts, so they don't count towards the 8 cache-lines limit.
>
Ok, good to go.
>
4. Depending on the size and alignment criteria of the the
    `Element` structure and the placement of the `next` and
    `prev` elements in the struct (unknowable from this example),
    `to->next` may be on another cache line.
>
The coder may need to be careful with such slot placement and
alignment, indeed.
>
Yup.  This could easily happen.  Consider,
>
#include <stdalign.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
>
struct elem {
         struct elem *next;
         struct elem *prev;
         uint32_t data;
};
[...]
 Indeed. Ideally, elem should be padded up to _and_ aligned on a l2 cache line boundary to help get rid of false sharing. Also, the "anchor" should be padded and aligned as well. An anchor can be:
 struct anchor
{
     std::atomic<elem*> m_head;
};
 
Actually, iirc pad and align the anchor to a reservation granule boundary, then pad and align its nodes to l2 cache line boundaries.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 25 * MSI interrupts163Robert Finch
13 Mar 25 `* Re: MSI interrupts162MitchAlsup1
13 Mar 25  +* Re: MSI interrupts5Robert Finch
13 Mar 25  i+- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
13 Mar 25  i`* Re: MSI interrupts3Robert Finch
13 Mar 25  i +- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
13 Mar 25  i `- Re: MSI interrupts1Stefan Monnier
13 Mar 25  `* Re: MSI interrupts156MitchAlsup1
13 Mar 25   `* Re: MSI interrupts155MitchAlsup1
14 Mar 25    `* Re: MSI interrupts154MitchAlsup1
14 Mar 25     `* Re: MSI interrupts153MitchAlsup1
14 Mar 25      `* Re: MSI interrupts152MitchAlsup1
15 Mar 25       `* Re: MSI interrupts151Robert Finch
15 Mar 25        `* Re: MSI interrupts150MitchAlsup1
15 Mar 25         `* Re: MSI interrupts149Robert Finch
15 Mar 25          `* Re: MSI interrupts148MitchAlsup1
16 Mar 25           `* Re: MSI interrupts147Robert Finch
16 Mar 25            +- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
17 Mar 25            +* Re: MSI interrupts142Michael S
17 Mar 25            i+- Re: MSI interrupts1Robert Finch
17 Mar 25            i+* Re: MSI interrupts133Robert Finch
18 Mar 25            ii+* Re: MSI interrupts127Robert Finch
19 Mar 25            iii+* Re: MSI interrupts124MitchAlsup1
19 Mar 25            iiii+* Re: MSI interrupts121Dan Cross
19 Mar 25            iiiii+* Re: MSI interrupts112MitchAlsup1
20 Mar 25            iiiiii`* Re: MSI interrupts111Dan Cross
20 Mar 25            iiiiii `* Re: MSI interrupts110MitchAlsup1
20 Mar 25            iiiiii  `* Re: MSI interrupts109Dan Cross
20 Mar 25            iiiiii   +* Re: MSI interrupts31MitchAlsup1
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i`* Re: MSI interrupts30Dan Cross
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i +* Re: MSI interrupts20MitchAlsup1
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i i+* Re: MSI interrupts18Stefan Monnier
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii`* Re: MSI interrupts17MitchAlsup1
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii `* Re: MSI interrupts16Dan Cross
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  +* Re: MSI interrupts8MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i`* Re: MSI interrupts7Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i `* Re: MSI interrupts6Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i  `* Re: MSI interrupts5Stefan Monnier
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i   +- Re: MSI interrupts1Stefan Monnier
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i   +- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
27 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i   `* Re: MSI interrupts2Terje Mathisen
27 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  i    `- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii  `* Re: MSI interrupts7Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii   `* Re: MSI interrupts6Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii    `* Re: MSI interrupts5Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii     `* Re: MSI interrupts4Dan Cross
26 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii      `* Re: MSI interrupts3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii       `* Re: MSI interrupts2Dan Cross
26 Mar 25            iiiiii   i ii        `- Re: MSI interrupts1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i i`- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i +- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i `* Re: MSI interrupts8Dan Cross
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i  `* Re: MSI interrupts7Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   i   `* Re: MSI interrupts6Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i    `* Re: MSI interrupts5Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i     +* Re: MSI interrupts2Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i     i`- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i     `* Re: MSI interrupts2Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii   i      `- Re: MSI interrupts1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   +- Re: MSI interrupts1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25            iiiiii   `* Re: MSI interrupts76Dan Cross
24 Mar 25            iiiiii    +* Re: MSI interrupts57MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i`* Re: MSI interrupts56Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i `* Re: MSI interrupts55MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i  +* Re: MSI interrupts2Stefan Monnier
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i  i`- Re: MSI interrupts1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i  +- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i  `* Re: MSI interrupts51MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i   `* Re: MSI interrupts50Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i    `* Re: MSI interrupts49MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i     `* Re: MSI interrupts48Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i      `* Re: MSI interrupts47MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i       `* Re: MSI interrupts46Dan Cross
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        +* Re: MSI interrupts8Stefan Monnier
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        i+* Re: MSI interrupts5Dan Cross
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        ii`* Re: MSI interrupts4Stefan Monnier
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        ii +- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        ii `* Re: MSI interrupts2MitchAlsup1
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        ii  `- Re: MSI interrupts1Stefan Monnier
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        i+- Re: MSI interrupts1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        i`- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i        `* Re: MSI interrupts37MitchAlsup1
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i         `* Re: MSI interrupts36Dan Cross
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i          +* Re: MSI interrupts4Stefan Monnier
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i          i`* Re: MSI interrupts3Dan Cross
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i          i `* Re: MSI interrupts2Chris M. Thomasson
4 Apr 25            iiiiii    i          i  `- Re: MSI interrupts1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i          `* Re: MSI interrupts31MitchAlsup1
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           +- Re: MSI interrupts1Stefan Monnier
26 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           +* Re: MSI interrupts2Stefan Monnier
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           i`- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           +* Re: MSI interrupts3MitchAlsup1
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           i`* Re: MSI interrupts2MitchAlsup1
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           i `- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i           `* Re: MSI interrupts24Dan Cross
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            +* Re: MSI interrupts2Stefan Monnier
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            i`- Re: MSI interrupts1Dan Cross
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            +* Re: MSI interrupts12MitchAlsup1
28 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            i`* Re: MSI interrupts11Dan Cross
28 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            i +- Re: MSI interrupts1MitchAlsup1
28 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            i +* Re: MSI interrupts5MitchAlsup1
28 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            i +* Re: MSI interrupts2Stefan Monnier
28 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            i `* Re: MSI interrupts2Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 25            iiiiii    i            `* Re: MSI interrupts9MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 25            iiiiii    `* Re: MSI interrupts18Dan Cross
20 Mar 25            iiiii`* Re: MSI interrupts8MitchAlsup1
19 Mar 25            iiii`* Re: MSI interrupts2MitchAlsup1
19 Mar 25            iii`* Re: MSI interrupts2Robert Finch
18 Mar 25            ii`* Re: MSI interrupts5MitchAlsup1
17 Mar 25            i`* Re: MSI interrupts7MitchAlsup1
17 Mar 25            `* Re: MSI interrupts3Robert Finch

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal