Why I've Dropped In

I haven't posted in this newsgroup for a while.
In case anyone has wondered why I've visited once again, it's for the
obvious reason. I've turned my attention again to Concertina II.
I thought that I had a great idea to reduce the overhead for certain
block types. Then I saw it had a flaw, But I could fix that flaw, but it
resulted in an inelegant asymmetry. Then I saw how to fix that! And then
I realized the fix still was missing something important.
So there will be some delay before I take another step in going around
in circles with Concertina II.
My brilliant idea? Reduce the displacements from 16 bits to 15, so that
memory-reference instructions could fit in 1/4 of the opcode space.
Then I could have blocks with variable-length instructions, as long as I
didn't allow instructions to cross block boundaries, with only 16 bits
of overhead.
But I knew I would never stay satisfied with only 15-bit displacements.
On further thought, I thought that I could still have 16-bit
displacements, and have a complete instruction set. But I ended up
realizing that I wouldn't have a complete instruction set for the blocks
with variable-length instructions.
John Savard