Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 20. May 2025, 01:01:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100ggod$1sbnn$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Mon, 19 May 2025 23:41:15 +0300, Michael S wrote:

What about PPC604? It had more limited OoO resources than the 3
processors you mentioned above, esp. fewer numeber of reservation
stations, but it most certainly had reorder buffers, 16 of them.
So, by your own definitions, it should be called the first single-chip
full-blown CPU.

Was it a PowerPC 604-based Apple Mac that was the first PC to exceed the
then-current US Department of Defense threshold for the definition of a
“supercomputer”? I think it might have been 1 gigaFLOPS at the time. (Or
is that too high for the time?)

That meant it was subject to export restrictions. I remember Apple making
a lot of publicity about it at the time.

Of course, the threshold was raised soon after.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers59Thomas Koenig
17 May 25 `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers58MitchAlsup1
18 May 25  +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers44Thomas Koenig
18 May 25  i`* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers43Michael S
18 May 25  i +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1MitchAlsup1
19 May 25  i `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers41quadibloc
19 May 25  i  `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers40Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 May 25  i   +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers26quadibloc
19 May 25  i   i+* OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)24Anton Ertl
19 May 25  i   ii+* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)8John Levine
19 May 25  i   iii`* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)7Anton Ertl
19 May 25  i   iii +* Re: OoO execution3Ze
20 May 25  i   iii i`* Re: OoO execution2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25  i   iii i `- Re: OoO execution1MitchAlsup1
21 May 25  i   iii `* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)3George Neuner
21 May 25  i   iii  +- Re: OoO execution1Stefan Monnier
21 May 25  i   iii  `- Re: OoO execution1moi
19 May 25  i   ii+* Re: OoO execution3quadibloc
19 May 25  i   iii`* Re: OoO execution2Terje Mathisen
19 May 25  i   iii `- Re: OoO execution1Michael S
19 May 25  i   ii+* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)9Michael S
20 May 25  i   iii+- Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25  i   iii`* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)7Anton Ertl
30 May 25  i   iii `* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)6Michael S
30 May 25  i   iii  +* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)4Al Kossow
30 May 25  i   iii  i+* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
31 May 25  i   iii  ii`- Re: OoO execution1MitchAlsup1
31 May 25  i   iii  i`- Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)1Anton Ertl
31 May 25  i   iii  `- Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)1Anton Ertl
29 May 25  i   ii`* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)3Thomas Koenig
29 May 25  i   ii `* Re: OoO execution2MitchAlsup1
29 May 25  i   ii  `- Re: OoO execution1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 May 25  i   i`- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 May 25  i   `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers13Michael S
20 May 25  i    `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25  i     `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers11Michael S
20 May 25  i      +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1MitchAlsup1
20 May 25  i      `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers9John Levine
20 May 25  i       +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1MitchAlsup1
21 May 25  i       `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers7Michael S
21 May 25  i        +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25  i        `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers5John Levine
21 May 25  i         +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2Michael S
21 May 25  i         i`- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1John Levine
25 May 25  i         `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2Lars Poulsen
25 May 25  i          `- Re: 360/44, The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1John Levine
18 May 25  `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers13Michael S
18 May 25   `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers12MitchAlsup1
19 May 25    `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers11Michael S
19 May 25     +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Al Kossow
19 May 25     `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers9MitchAlsup1
19 May 25      +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2Michael S
20 May 25      i`- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1BGB
20 May 25      +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25      i`* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2MitchAlsup1
21 May 25      i `- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 May 25      `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers3Brian G. Lucas
26 May 25       `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2MitchAlsup1
27 May 25        `- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Al Kossow

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal