Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 20. May 2025, 11:45:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250520134518.0000531e@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Mon, 19 May 2025 23:58:16 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2025 16:55:49 +0300, Michael S wrote:
 
On Mon, 19 May 2025 01:56:50 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
 
They were orders of magnitude faster than anything from IBM. 
 
That sounds like exaggeration. 
 
Thomas Watson Jr, boss of IBM, sent out the following memo after the
1963 Business Week feature on CDC and the forthcoming 6600:
 
    Last week Control Data had a press conference during which they
    officially announced their 6600 system. I understand that in the
    laboratory developing this system there are only 34 people,
    including the janitor. Of these, 14 are engineers and 4 are
    programmers, and only one person has a Ph.D., a relatively junior
    programmer. Contrasting this modest effort with our own vast
    development activities, I fail to understand why we have lost our
    industry leadership position by letting someone else offer the
    world’s most powerful computer.
 

At time of introduction CDC 6600 was undoubtedly much faster both than
older [more expensive] IBM 7030 and than contemporary [significantly
less expensive] S/360 Model 50. But it was not "orders of magnitude
faster". Not even one order of magnitude faster, except, may be, vs
Model 50 in artificial very memory-light floating-point intensive
scenarios.
High end S/360 (Model 65) came about half a year later. I would imagine
that for non-floating-point code it had about the same speed as 6600.
Or not, I don't really know.

They pioneered the very concept of a “supercomputer”.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_7030_Stretch 
 
Let’s just say, the 7030 was just the start of a long IBM tradition
of over-promising and under-delivering.

It is true that IBM was over-promising und under-delivering with 7030.
It does not change the fact that it was called "supercomputer" and that
despite under-delivery until introduction of 6600 it was the fastest
computer in the world.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May21:00 * The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers45Thomas Koenig
17 May22:27 `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers44MitchAlsup1
18 May06:46  +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers33Thomas Koenig
18 May16:23  i`* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers32Michael S
18 May23:02  i +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1MitchAlsup1
19 May02:08  i `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers30quadibloc
19 May02:56  i  `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 May04:12  i   +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers17quadibloc
19 May07:22  i   i+* OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)15Anton Ertl
19 May18:10  i   ii+* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)8John Levine
19 May18:46  i   iii`* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)7Anton Ertl
19 May20:09  i   iii +* Re: OoO execution3Ze
20 May01:04  i   iii i`* Re: OoO execution2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May01:30  i   iii i `- Re: OoO execution1MitchAlsup1
21 May17:52  i   iii `* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)3George Neuner
21 May18:14  i   iii  +- Re: OoO execution1Stefan Monnier
21 May18:47  i   iii  `- Re: OoO execution1moi
19 May20:08  i   ii+* Re: OoO execution3quadibloc
19 May21:04  i   iii`* Re: OoO execution2Terje Mathisen
19 May21:27  i   iii `- Re: OoO execution1Michael S
19 May21:41  i   ii`* Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)3Michael S
20 May01:01  i   ii +- Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May22:21  i   ii `- Re: OoO execution (was: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers)1Anton Ertl
19 May08:50  i   i`- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 May14:55  i   `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers11Michael S
20 May00:58  i    `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May11:45  i     `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers9Michael S
20 May17:59  i      +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1MitchAlsup1
20 May20:59  i      `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers7John Levine
20 May23:48  i       +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1MitchAlsup1
21 May09:21  i       `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers5Michael S
21 May09:44  i        +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May17:09  i        `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers3John Levine
21 May18:11  i         `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2Michael S
21 May21:04  i          `- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1John Levine
18 May09:33  `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers10Michael S
18 May23:01   `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers9MitchAlsup1
19 May14:35    `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers8Michael S
19 May17:49     +- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Al Kossow
19 May19:14     `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers6MitchAlsup1
19 May21:11      +* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2Michael S
20 May07:36      i`- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1BGB
20 May06:40      `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May17:58       `* Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers2MitchAlsup1
21 May01:28        `- Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal