| Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
At a very slow clock rate, and without logic burning power.>Actually, you're not far off. It's a serial shift chain which isEven state-of-the-art CPUs today commonly use scan-chains (via JTAG)Is there some blog somewhere that explains how scan-chains work (not
for debuggin.
how they're used, but how they're implemented inside the CPU)?
Intuitively they sound very costly to me, because of things like the
need to run extra wires all over the place. I'm obviously
missing something.
shifted
one-bit at a time to capture flop states. Each chain is a single wire;
a chip may have a few dozen individual shift chains.
https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/48331/scan-chains-pnr-outlook.html
Thanks. Wow. So it is really that bad, huh?
I also liked the note about speed limits and power consumption, how
shifting a state (in or out) causes (almost) all the flip-flops to
change state at each cycle, thus leading to very high power consumption.
What's the approximate cost of those scan chains. I.e. if we were toA D-flip-flop can be implemented in 4 gates (but often 5)
take an existing working design and replace all the "flip-flop with
scan-chain" with "plain flip-flops", how much smaller would the
resulting chip be, how much faster could it run, and how much less power
could it consume?
I assume the cost in terms of power consumption is small because inIn normal use, the scan attachments are just additional capacitance
normal use, the scan-chain part stays completely stable so that barring
leakage it should not consume any power, save for the indirect costs
like the need to move the other bits over greater distances when
the extra wires of the scan chains get in the way.
>
>
Stefan
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.