Sujet : Re: OoO execution
De : monnier (at) *nospam* iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 16. Jul 2025, 22:45:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <jwvo6tjbyrt.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
I don't know about PPro in the integer section, but it was definitely
OoO in branches, the memory section, and in the PFU. So, I don't see
why they would not have had integer OoO.
For the /91 I can see some potential simplifications to keep some parts
in-order, but for the PPro it seems to me that the requirements of
precise-exceptions make it so having some parts OoO and some parts
in-order wouldn't give much benefits (if any).
Stefan