Sujet : Re: Log for debug purposes
De : pozzugno (at) *nospam* gmail.com (pozz)
Groupes : comp.arch.embeddedDate : 23. May 2024, 22:25:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2o8o9$1tpcf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Il 23/05/2024 13:46, David Brown ha scritto:
On 22/05/2024 22:36, pozz wrote:
I don't repeat here what is written there[1]. I found trice library and I find it interesting to emit log messages for debug purposes, avoiding printf execution on the target.
>
What I don't like is patching my code before compiling. This step delays the build process and could mess up the repository, even if is simple to un-patch the code before committing.
>
Do you apply other strategies?
>
I'm thinking to introduce this type of log in one of my application where the firmware runs on an embedded platform indirectly connected to Internet. I mean the main MCU is connected to another Internet-connected device by a RS485 bus.
>
It could be very useful to receive logs from the main MCU through Internet.
>
>
[1] https://github.com/rokath/trice
I would not use a system that changed my source code - it's just out of the question for me. I'm fine with /generation/ of source code files as part of a build process, but not /changing/ code I have written. So if I were making a system like this, I would definitely not have it change the source code.
This is the same reason I didn't completely like that project. However it remains interesting.
Suppose you want to trace calls to the "new_position" function in your source code file "positioning.c". With trice, you'd have something like:
void new_position(uint32_t x, uint32_y, int16_t a)
{
trice("Moved to new position %lud, %lud, %d", x, y, a);
...
}
After the patching, you get a parameter "iD(1234)" added to that macro.
My way to handle this would be that you write :
trice(new_position, "Moved to new position %lud, %lud, %d", x,
y, a);
Here, I'd be using a definition of the macro "trice" to convert this to:
trice_new_position(x, y, a)
The pre-processing step, the equivalent of "trice insert", would run through the file "positioning.c" and generate files "positioning.trace.json" and "positioning.trace.h". The id would be generated from a 32-bit hash (say 1234) of "positioning.c" and "new_position", and the json file would include an entry with the hash, the filename, function name and line number, the format string, and the names of the parameters. The header file would contain a line:
#define trice_new_position(x, y, a) do_trice_3(1234, x, y, a)
And do_trice_3() would be an inline function that sends out the trace on the uart (or whatever).
The file "positioning.c" would have a line #include "positioning.trice.h". The generated files (including that header) would be in the build directory, not the source directory, and generated automatically by the makefile whenever the C code changed.
This would give you everything you get from the "trice" library, but without any patching or unpatching, and with the trace generation updated automatically as part of the "make" process.
I think it could be done a bit smarter, using _Generic macros to handle detection of the types of the parameters so that sizes get handled automatically.
Sure it could be an improvement.
In real work now, however, I'd use C++ to avoid any need of modifying the source code or generating header files. (You would still need to chew through the source code to make the json file or other input to the PC side of the tracer. But I think if portability is not an issue, that could be handled by having the "trice" macros put the information in a special elf section that is then read by the tracer program.)
Too complex for me to follow this arguments.