Re: Improving build system

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ca embedded 
Sujet : Re: Improving build system
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.arch.embedded
Date : 16. May 2025, 16:20:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1007l3p$3qs5b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 16/05/2025 15:45, pozz wrote:
Il 14/05/2025 11:03, David Brown ha scritto:
On 13/05/2025 17:57, pozz wrote:
[...]
3.
>
Makefiles can be split up.  Use "include" - and remember that you can do so using macros.  In my makefile setups, I have a file "host.mk" that is used to identify the build host, then pull in a file that is specific to the host:
>
# This is is for identifying host computer to get the paths right
>
ifeq ($(OS),Windows_NT)
   # We are on a Windows machine
   host_os := windows
   host := $(COMPUTERNAME)
else
   # Linux machine
   host_os := linux
   host := $(shell hostname)
endif
>
ifeq "$(call file-exists,makes/host_$(host).mk)" "1"
   include makes/host_$(host).mk
else
   $(error No host makefile host_$(host).mk found)
endif
>
Then I have files like "host_xxx.mk" for a computer named "xxx", containing things like :
>
toolchain_path := /opt/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/bin/
>
or
>
toolchain_path := c:/micros/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10_2020-q4-major/bin/
>
>
All paths to compilers and other build-related programs are specified in these files.  The only things that are taken from the OS path are standard and common programs that do not affect the resulting binary files.
 Regarding this point, I tried to set
     toolchain_path := c:\msys64\mingw64\bin
 
What happens when you use the correct path?
toolchain_path := c:/msys64/mingw64/bin/
(Note the trailing slash - or you can add it when you use the macro.)
Strive to get rid of all the Windows idiosyncrasies here.
make, gcc and all the other relevant tools here are from a *nix background.  Use them with that in mind and it will all be smoother.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 May 25 * Improving build system19pozz
13 May 25 +- Re: Improving build system1Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester
14 May 25 +* Re: Improving build system16David Brown
14 May 25 i+* Re: Improving build system11pozz
15 May 25 ii+* Re: Improving build system4Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester
15 May 25 iii`* Re: Improving build system3David Brown
16 May 25 iii `* Re: Improving build system2Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester
16 May 25 iii  `- Re: Improving build system1David Brown
15 May 25 ii`* Re: Improving build system6David Brown
15 May 25 ii `* Re: Improving build system5pozz
16 May 25 ii  `* Re: Improving build system4David Brown
16 May 25 ii   `* Re: Improving build system3pozz
16 May 25 ii    `* Re: Improving build system2David Brown
16 May 25 ii     `- Re: Improving build system1pozz
15 May 25 i+- Re: Improving build system1David Brown
16 May 25 i`* Re: Improving build system3pozz
16 May 25 i `* Re: Improving build system2David Brown
17 May 25 i  `- Re: Improving build system1pozz
14 May 25 `- Re: Improving build system1Stefan Reuther

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal