Re: Confused first time Kate user

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c editors 
Sujet : Re: Confused first time Kate user
De : rowlett (at) *nospam* access.net (Richard Owlett)
Groupes : comp.editors
Date : 03. Jul 2024, 13:45:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v63h50$26hsm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4
On 07/03/2024 06:46 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
In article <v63bs4$25m5u$1@dont-email.me>,
Richard Owlett  <rowlett@access.net> wrote:
...
This regex expression should do what you want:
[[:digit:]]{3}
>
>
I suspect that would accept a value of "0".
*ERROR* with results I don't wish to contemplate.
 I suspect that what you want to do actually can't be done (accurately) with
regexps, if we interpret your requirements literally.  Most responders so
far have pretty much glossed over your requirements.
You noticed < *GRIN* >
Unfortunately that's fairly common on USENET.
I'm used to windowing "wheat" from "chaff".

 For example, while
you want to match (and replace) XYZ299, you want to leave XYZ300 alone.
Actually its more the case  that for _my_ application XYZ300 and above physically cannot exist.

 You probably need a programming languages (such as AWK) to do this correctly.
No. Further in this thread Janis Papanagnou demonstrated what I needed.

 Note, BTW, that the real problem with regexps is that there are so many
different implementations.  Supposedly, there is a standard - actually,
multiple standards - but each implementation is subtly different.  For
example, sometimes you need \ before special characters like ( or { or ?
and sometimes you don't (depending on which implementation you are using).
 
Yepp.
That's why my "Subject:" AND first sentence explicitly reference Kate.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Jul 24 * Confused first time Kate user16Richard Owlett
2 Jul 24 +* Re: Confused first time Kate user7candycanearter07
2 Jul 24 i+* Re: Confused first time Kate user3Janis Papanagnou
3 Jul 24 ii+- Re: Confused first time Kate user1Richard Owlett
3 Jul 24 ii`- Re: Confused first time Kate user1candycanearter07
3 Jul 24 i`* Re: Confused first time Kate user3Richard Owlett
3 Jul 24 i `* Re: Confused first time Kate user2Kenny McCormack
3 Jul 24 i  `- Re: Confused first time Kate user1Richard Owlett
2 Jul 24 +* Re: Confused first time Kate user3Janis Papanagnou
3 Jul 24 i+- Re: Confused first time Kate user1Richard Owlett
3 Jul 24 i`- Re: Confused first time Kate user1Richard Owlett
3 Jul 24 `* CLARIFICATION [Re: Confused first time Kate user]5Richard Owlett
5 Jul 24  `* Re: CLARIFICATION [Re: Confused first time Kate user]4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jul 24   `* Various forms of Regexps in tools (standard and non-standard) (was Re: CLARIFICATION ...)3Janis Papanagnou
5 Jul 24    `* Re: Various forms of Regexps in tools (standard and non-standard) (was Re: CLARIFICATION ...)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul 24     `- Re: Various forms of Regexps in tools (standard and non-standard) (was Re: CLARIFICATION ...)1Janis Papanagnou

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal