Sujet : Re: CS-234 Discussion
De : jhugentobler (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Jhugentobler)
Groupes : comp.eduDate : 23. Sep 2024, 18:47:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcs9io$2q20h$1@jhugentobler.eternal-september.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.5.11-linuxkit (aarch64))
CS234 <
cs234@lhmerino.dont-email.me> wrote:
This thread is intended for the students of CS-234: Technologies for democratic society
How does Usenet fit into the vision presented by Licklider and Taylor in
"The Computer as a Communication Device"?
Reflect on:
- Which aspects of their vision are realized through Usenet?
- What aspects have evolved differently from what they imagined?
Feel free to respond to comments made by your classmates as well.
Usenet aligns with how Licklider and Taylor thought about:
- Enabling geographically separate people to communicate and form communities
- Providing a platform for many-to-many communication and collaborative discussion beyond
one-to-one or broadcast models.
- Allowing for asynchronous participation, giving users flexibility in when they engage
- Creating a shared information space where knowledge can be collectively developed
However, Usenet differs from Licklider and Taylor’s their vision in some major ways:
- Lacks the rich interactive capabilities they imagined, like shared screens and models.
because Usenet is primarily text-based.
- The lack of moderation tools led to issues with misinformation/spam which resulted in
communities not being as cohesive or effective
- It did not become as ubiquitous or integrated into daily work/life as they predicted
Overall, Usenet was an important early step toward realizing the potential of computer
communication, but was not the full vision imagined by either thinkers.