Sujet : Re: CS-234 Discussion
De : habibb (at) *nospam* habibb.dont-email.me (habibb)
Groupes : comp.eduDate : 24. Sep 2024, 19:10:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcuvag$39v7p$6@habibb.dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/5.15.153.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 (x86_64))
CS234 <
cs234@lhmerino.dont-email.me> wrote:
This thread is intended for the students of CS-234: Technologies for democratic society
How does Usenet fit into the vision presented by Licklider and Taylor in
"The Computer as a Communication Device"?
Reflect on:
- Which aspects of their vision are realized through Usenet?
- What aspects have evolved differently from what they imagined?
Feel free to respond to comments made by your classmates as well.
Licklider and Taylor’s vision in “The Computer as a Communication Device” imagined
computers as tools for enhancing collaboration, which Usenet exemplifies by enabling
knowledge sharing and discussions in a decentralized format. However, Usenet is more
technical and less user-friendly than modern platforms like Facebook or Twitter, which
better facilitate communication for the average user. They also did not anticipate the
rise of these centralized platforms that dominate online discourse today. Furthermore,
Licklider and Taylor overlooked challenges like spam, trolling, and misinformation
inherent in open networks like Usenet, leading to chaotic discussions and difficulties
in managing abusive behavior, contrasting with their vision of constructive
communication.