Sujet : Re: CS-234 Discussion
De : root (at) *nospam* 255.255.255.255 (root)
Groupes : comp.eduDate : 25. Sep 2024, 10:40:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd0lqr$3knav$2@sba3.dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/5.15.153.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 (x86_64))
CS234 <
cs234@lhmerino.dont-email.me> wrote:
This thread is intended for the students of CS-234: Technologies for democratic society
How does Usenet fit into the vision presented by Licklider and Taylor in
"The Computer as a Communication Device"?
Reflect on:
- Which aspects of their vision are realized through Usenet?
- What aspects have evolved differently from what they imagined?
Feel free to respond to comments made by your classmates as well.
Usenet's origin really embodies a number of the visions that Licklider and Taylor outlined in "The Computer as a
Communication Device," perhaps most specifically computers enabling global, collaborative communication.
Usenet also allowed different people to share information, ideas, and discussions
across distributed networks, promoting the sense of a connected community, much like the envisioned
"online interactive communities." The course of evolution taken by Usenet, however,
diverged in important ways. Whereas Licklider and Taylor envisioned even more
active, real-time collaborations running in parallel with human thought processes,
in general, Usenet supported asynchronous discussions.
Their vision of such online communities
also suggested more organized, curated methods of communication in contrast to the decentralized,
unmoderated spams, and content fragmentations characteristic of Usenet.