Sujet : Re: CS-234 Discussion
De : dmarinov (at) *nospam* dmarinov.dont-email.me (Deyan Marinov)
Groupes : comp.eduDate : 28. Sep 2024, 16:44:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd9897$1afbc$2@dmarinov.dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.10.10-arch1-1 (x86_64))
Usenet, an early online discussion platform from the 1980s, made parts
of Licklider and Taylor’s vision of computers as communication tools a
reality. It let people from all over the world share information and
join communities based on common interests, all without a central system
controlling everything. However, while it helped connect people, Usenet
didn’t have the easy-to-use interfaces or live interactions that they
had imagined (it is purely text-based). Problems like moderation challenges,
spam, and flame wars also made it different from the structured, productive
exchanges they hoped for. Usenet was a starting point, but newer systems
have come closer to their vision of smooth, real-time communication (e.g.
instant messaging, social media, etc.).
CS234 <
cs234@lhmerino.dont-email.me> wrote:
This thread is intended for the students of CS-234: Technologies for democratic society
How does Usenet fit into the vision presented by Licklider and Taylor in
"The Computer as a Communication Device"?
Reflect on:
- Which aspects of their vision are realized through Usenet?
- What aspects have evolved differently from what they imagined?
Feel free to respond to comments made by your classmates as well.