Sujet : Re: hamradio/satellite
De : dan (at) *nospam* djph.net (Dan Purgert)
Groupes : comp.infosystems.geminiDate : 16. Aug 2024, 10:46:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvbu7uo.28a.dan@djph.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-08-15, Emil Tomczyk wrote:
It'd be questionable at best (at least in the US), due to the integral
encryption.
>
Isn't encryption in ham banned everywhere?
I don't know, and didn't want to speak for everyone ;)
What about configuring daemon to use TLS only to sign communication,
not encrypt it?
I believe signatures are okay, as their intent is not to "obscure
meaning" of a transmitted message.
-- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert|O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
hamradio/satellite
Re: hamradio/satellite