Re: systemd controversy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl ada 
Sujet : Re: systemd controversy
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.ada
Date : 13. Mar 2024, 22:55:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ust7bl$15mv5$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:34:14 +0200, magardner2010 wrote:

So, unless one is writing software that directly interacts with the init
system ...

If you are writing code that will run as one or more server processes, you
will likely also want to provide scripts/config to manage those processes.
For systemd, that could be service definition files.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 24 * SystemD controversy21Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
13 Mar 24 +* Re: SystemD controversy19magardner2010
13 Mar 24 i+* Re: SystemD controversy2Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
13 Mar 24 ii`- Re: SystemD controversy1Keith Thompson
13 Mar 24 i`* Re: systemd controversy16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 24 i `* Re: systemd controversy15streaksu
18 Mar 24 i  `* Re: systemd controversy14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Mar 24 i   +* Re: systemd controversy3streaksu
19 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: systemd controversy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Mar 24 i   i `- Re: systemd controversy1streaksu
19 Mar 24 i   +* Re: systemd controversy9Kevin Chadwick
20 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: systemd controversy8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Mar 24 i   i `* Re: systemd controversy7Kevin Chadwick
20 Mar 24 i   i  `* Re: systemd controversy6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Mar 24 i   i   `* Re: systemd controversy5Kevin Chadwick
21 Mar 24 i   i    `* Re: systemd controversy4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Mar 24 i   i     +- Re: systemd controversy1Alexis
21 Mar 24 i   i     `* Re: systemd controversy2Kevin Chadwick
21 Mar 24 i   i      `- Re: systemd controversy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Mar 24 i   `- Re: systemd controversy1Alexis
13 Mar 24 `- Re: SystemD controversy1Pascal Obry

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal