Re: systemd controversy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl ada 
Sujet : Re: systemd controversy
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.ada
Date : 20. Mar 2024, 00:29:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utd3ku$12lm6$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:16:50 -0000 (UTC), Kevin Chadwick wrote:

The declarative systemd unit-file syntax should be easier to translate
to other forms than perhaps going the other way.
 
I can't see how non portable unit files backed by c code are more
helpful than atleast more portable scripts with less c per command to
interpret, to be honest.

The unit files are in the classic .INI file format, which has been around
for decades. Code for parsing it should be readily available for every
language in common use.

Scripts need an interpreter. Being Turing-complete, in general information
cannot be extracted from them except by running them. Unit files have a
fixed vocabulary of keyword entries, which can be easily enumerated,
looked up, whatever. That’s what’s meant by “declarative”.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 24 * SystemD controversy21Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
13 Mar 24 +* Re: SystemD controversy19magardner2010
13 Mar 24 i+* Re: SystemD controversy2Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
13 Mar 24 ii`- Re: SystemD controversy1Keith Thompson
13 Mar 24 i`* Re: systemd controversy16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 24 i `* Re: systemd controversy15streaksu
18 Mar 24 i  `* Re: systemd controversy14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Mar 24 i   +* Re: systemd controversy3streaksu
19 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: systemd controversy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Mar 24 i   i `- Re: systemd controversy1streaksu
19 Mar 24 i   +* Re: systemd controversy9Kevin Chadwick
20 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: systemd controversy8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Mar 24 i   i `* Re: systemd controversy7Kevin Chadwick
20 Mar 24 i   i  `* Re: systemd controversy6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Mar 24 i   i   `* Re: systemd controversy5Kevin Chadwick
21 Mar 24 i   i    `* Re: systemd controversy4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Mar 24 i   i     +- Re: systemd controversy1Alexis
21 Mar 24 i   i     `* Re: systemd controversy2Kevin Chadwick
21 Mar 24 i   i      `- Re: systemd controversy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Mar 24 i   `- Re: systemd controversy1Alexis
13 Mar 24 `- Re: SystemD controversy1Pascal Obry

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal