Re: "sed" question

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl awk 
Sujet : Re: "sed" question
De : geoff (at) *nospam* clare.See-My-Signature.invalid (Geoff Clare)
Groupes : comp.lang.awk
Date : 12. Mar 2024, 14:47:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <tv26ck-3qt.ln1@ID-313840.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4)
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Do Linux and Unix have a ONE AND ONLY ONE STANDARD regex library?
 
It seemed that tools and programming languages have their own
implementions, let alone different versions among them.

In the POSIX/UNIX standard the functions used for handling regular
expressions are regcomp() and regexec() (and regerror() and regfree()).
They are in the C library, not a separate "regex library".

They support different RE flavours via flags.  The standard requires
that "basic regular expressions" (default) and "extended regular
expressions" (with REG_EXTENDED flag) are supported.  Implementations
can support other flavours with non-standard flags.

POSIX requires that awk uses extended regular expressions (i.e. the
same as regcomp() with REG_EXTENDED).

--
Geoff Clare <netnews@gclare.org.uk>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Mar 24 * Re: "sed" question13Grant Taylor
8 Mar 24 `* Re: "sed" question12Keith Thompson
8 Mar 24  +* Re: "sed" question10Mr. Man-wai Chang
8 Mar 24  i`* Re: "sed" question9Janis Papanagnou
8 Mar 24  i +* Re: "sed" question6Grant Taylor
8 Mar 24  i i+* Re: "sed" question4Mr. Man-wai Chang
12 Mar 24  i ii`* Re: "sed" question3Geoff Clare
12 Mar 24  i ii `* Re: "sed" question2Aharon Robbins
13 Mar 24  i ii  `- Re: "sed" question1Geoff Clare
9 Mar 24  i i`- Re: "sed" question1Janis Papanagnou
8 Mar 24  i `* Re: "sed" question2Mr. Man-wai Chang
9 Mar 24  i  `- Re: "sed" question1Janis Papanagnou
8 Mar 24  `- Re: "sed" question1Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal