Sujet : Re: Operator precedence
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.awkDate : 31. May 2024, 16:16:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3cpki$29dj3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 30.05.2024 10:22, Axel Reichert wrote:
[...] It is the infix languages (which boast as an
advantage to be closer the usual mathematical notation) where I think it
is crucial to stay close to the mathematical notation, otherwise the
purported advantage vanishes immediately.
Obviously there's other serious opinions differing from this view,
as we've seen. (It's certainly more comfortable to stay with old
conventions. Sometimes it's necessary to jettison something if it
got inappropriate or if there's new aspects that changes weight.)
Janis
Operator precedence
Re: Operator precedence