Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl awk 
Sujet : Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.lang.awk
Date : 03. Jun 2025, 12:04:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <101mkr9$5sam$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <683e9c84$0$691$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>,
Mack The Knife <mack@the-knife.org> wrote:
In article <101fv4s$1g5c8$1@dont-email.me>,
Janis Papanagnou  <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, maybe I could write an extension to work on memory
mapped files - the data originally stems from a file -
and seek/read through "C" mechanisms. (But that's huge
effort compared to some natively available function. And
then I'd probably better implement that straightly in "C"
instead of using Awk, in the first place, since I'd have
to implement the GNU Awk Extension anyway in "C".)
>
Janis
>
You could check w/Arnold about his consulting rates. Perhaps
he would do a patch for you, or write an extension function
for you.

Yeah, I think that aspect of it has already been covered.

The thing is - you have to understand that the mentality of a certain kind
of poster is to not be oriented towards: "How can I get my specific,
personal problem solved?"

But rather, it is: "Can I get (*) my personal pet feature into the GAWK core?"

(*) And by "get", I mean "nag the core developers into adding it".

And don't get me wrong, this approach is not without merit.  Getting it
into the core benefits everybody, not just the poster (nagger).  Suppose
that GAWK had a misfeature where when you added 2 and 2, you get 3.79.  If
we could nag them into changing it so that adding 2 and 2 produced 4
instead, that would benefit everybody and it would be worthwhile for us all
to do that nagging (rather than have one of us here on the newsgroup cook
up a personalized solution that benefits only the poster).

But, getting back to topic, it (the "mentality" to which I refer above)
does represent a stark difference of opinion and purpose to what most of us
here on this and other newsgroups hold to.

Anyway, there is more I could say on this subject, but I think I've said
enough for now.  But it is likely that an extension to do exactly this will
end up getting written by me and posted here soon - given that I've already
spec'd it out pretty thoroughly.

--
[Donald] Trump didn't have it all handed to him by his parents,
like Hillary Clinton did.

- Some dumb cluck in Ohio; featured in Michael Moore's "Trumpland" -

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 May 25 * substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.18Janis Papanagnou
31 May 25 `* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.17Mack The Knife
31 May 25  +* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.15Janis Papanagnou
1 Jun 25  i+* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.8Ben Bacarisse
1 Jun 25  ii+* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.3Janis Papanagnou
1 Jun 25  iii`* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.2Kenny McCormack
1 Jun 25  iii `- Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.1Janis Papanagnou
1 Jun 25  ii`* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.4Kenny McCormack
1 Jun 25  ii `* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.3Janis Papanagnou
1 Jun 25  ii  `* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.2Kenny McCormack
7 Jun 25  ii   `- Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.1Janis Papanagnou
3 Jun 25  i`* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.6Mack The Knife
3 Jun 25  i +- Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.1Kenny McCormack
7 Jun 25  i `* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.4Janis Papanagnou
8 Jun 25  i  `* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.3Mack The Knife
11 Jun 25  i   `* Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.2Janis Papanagnou
11 Jun 25  i    `- Meta chat (Was: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.)1Kenny McCormack
1 Jun 25  `- Re: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.1Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal