Sujet : Meta chat (Was: substr() - copying or not copying, that is here the question.)
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.lang.awkDate : 11. Jun 2025, 13:11:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <102brp6$iaa1$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
102bh1b$1sskv$1@dont-email.me>,
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+
ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
...
I'm not interested in meta-chat. - But you can derive part
of the answer already from my recent reply to Kenny's post
(only a few days ago). HTH.
Yes. I agree. I have included the text below - for Mack's benefit.
It summarizes quite accurately your position on this issue and should be
taken as the final word.
--- Cut Here ---
I don't know where you've got that from. - I was merely suggesting
an IMO sensible and compatible change of a function in a way other
functions (standard and non-standard) have already been extended.
I think it belongs in the core and I was suggesting and discussing
that.
If the relevant official developers don't think so then it is as it
is and they may just ignore my suggestion. I have no stakes in GNU
Awk, only (maybe academical) interest, so I even don't really care
much beyond that.
Janis
--- Cut Here ---
Mack's confusion arises from being confused about what your motives are.
(I could - and probably will at some later time - expand upon what I mean
by this, but for now, the previous sentence will have to suffice)
-- In American politics, there are two things you just don't f*ck with: 1) Goldman Sachs 2) The military/industrial complex