Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?

olcott writes:

On 5/19/2024 8:52 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:

>
That's not research, that's nonsense.
>

>
This is not the forum to show that it is not nonsense this is
a simple C question that I should not even have to ask except
for a few people in another forum that consistently lie about
the answer.

It's much more preferrable to show actual C code, when asking a C question,  instead of something that looks like BASIC. There are ways of annotating C  code that still manages to accomplish the feat of resulting in valid C code,  that reads naturally to anyone who expects to read C or C++.

I have been a professional C++ developer since Y2K. So I already
know the answer, I just need some competent people in this forum
to attest to this answer. I met Bjarne Stroustrup back when he
was going around the country promoting his new language.

Big deal. You were hoping to impress someone? I've got about a decade on  you, and I wrote my own K&R C compiler, long before Y2K. I don't brag about  it. Sit down, kid.

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Of course. A copyright statement. How impressive.
Your delusions of self-grandeur are only your delusions, not shared by  anyone else.