Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?
De : Bonita.Montero (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Bonita Montero)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.c
Date : 22. May 2024, 06:40:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2jt03$118ea$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 22.05.2024 um 06:37 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 11:29 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 20:48 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 1:39 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 20:24 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 1:13 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 20:09 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 1:01 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 16:09 schrieb olcott:
>
I am only asking the c experts here whether or not D correctly
simulated by *pure function* H can possibly reach its own line
06 and halt for every H/D pair matching the template provided.
>
Saying this is a question about C is like questioning something
about physics in Polish and claiming this is a question about
Polish.
>
I am convinced that the question can be fully answered entirely on the
basis of the semantics of C in the exact same way that the termination
status of the following functions can be answered entirely on the basis
of sufficient knowledge of the semantics of c.
>
*If you believe otherwise then I ask for you to please justify this*
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
   Infinite_Recursion();
}
>
int factorial(int n) // called with 5
{
   if (n >= 1)
     return n*factorial(n-1);
   else
     return 1;
}
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
>
>
This is possible with most languages so this isn't a question about C.
>
None-the-less the semantics of my code template does seem
to prove the result that I stated. I would not even be here
except for the people in the other forum that consistently
lie about this.
>
>
You're neither asking about a C- or C++ problem.
So use a proper newsgroup.
>
>
There is no other group that knows enough about the semantics of the
C programming language and there is no other group still alive that
knows enough about the semantics of programming languages.
>
>
comp.theory is the most apppropriate group.
>
 They have proven to not be the right group because they have
consistently lied about this for two years.
Maybe, but according to the topic this group fits.

 It is trivial to see that for every H/D pair of the infinite
set of H/D pairs that match the below template that
 D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own final
state at line 06 and halt because D correctly simulated by
H remains stuck in recursive simulation.
 This provides the basis for simulating termination analyzer H to
correctly determine that the halting problem's counter-example
input D cannot possibly halt.
 typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int D(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         H(D,D);
12         return 0;
13       }
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 May 24 * Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?136olcott
19 May 24 +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Richard Damon
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Sam
19 May 24 i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2olcott
19 May 24 i `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1jak
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?128Bonita Montero
19 May 24 i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?127olcott
19 May 24 i +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Richard Damon
20 May 24 i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?125Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?124olcott
20 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?54Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?53olcott
20 May 24 i   i +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?44Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?43olcott
20 May 24 i   i i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?42Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?41olcott
20 May 24 i   i i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?40Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?39olcott
20 May 24 i   i i     +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Richard Harnden
20 May 24 i   i i     i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?36Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i      `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?35olcott
20 May 24 i   i i       `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?34Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?13olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?12Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?11olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i  i `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?6Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i      `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i       `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?20Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i         `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?19olcott
20 May 24 i   i i          `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?18Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i           `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?17olcott
20 May 24 i   i i            `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?16Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i             `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?15olcott
20 May 24 i   i i              `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?14Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i               `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?13olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?12Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                 +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                 `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?10olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?9Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?8Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?7olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i  `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?8Fred. Zwarts
20 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?7olcott
20 May 24 i   i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Paavo Helde
20 May 24 i   i   i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
21 May 24 i   i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   i      `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?37wij
20 May 24 i   i+* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5olcott
20 May 24 i   ii`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4wij
20 May 24 i   ii `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
20 May 24 i   ii  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2wij
20 May 24 i   ii   `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
21 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?31Keith Thompson
21 May 24 i   i +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Keith Thompson
21 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?29olcott
21 May 24 i   i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?27Janis Papanagnou
21 May 24 i   i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?26olcott
21 May 24 i   i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?25Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i     `* Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?24olcott
21 May 24 i   i      `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?23Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i       `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?22olcott
21 May 24 i   i        `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?21Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i         `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?20olcott
21 May 24 i   i          `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?19Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i           `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?18olcott
22 May 24 i   i            +* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?7Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            i`* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?6olcott
22 May 24 i   i            i `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?5Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            i  `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?4olcott
22 May 24 i   i            i   `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            i    `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2olcott
22 May 24 i   i            i     `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            `* D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation10olcott
22 May 24 i   i             +* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation8wij
22 May 24 i   i             i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]3olcott
22 May 24 i   i             ii`* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]2olcott
22 May 24 i   i             ii `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]1wij
22 May 24 i   i             i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation4olcott
23 May 24 i   i             i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation3Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 24 i   i             i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation2olcott
23 May 24 i   i             i   `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation1Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i             `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation1Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?32Sam
20 May 24 `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Marcel Mueller

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal