Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.c
Date : 22. May 2024, 06:46:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2jtal$114ps$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/21/2024 11:40 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 22.05.2024 um 06:37 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 11:29 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 20:48 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 1:39 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 20:24 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 1:13 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 20:09 schrieb olcott:
On 5/21/2024 1:01 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 21.05.2024 um 16:09 schrieb olcott:
>
I am only asking the c experts here whether or not D correctly
simulated by *pure function* H can possibly reach its own line
06 and halt for every H/D pair matching the template provided.
>
Saying this is a question about C is like questioning something
about physics in Polish and claiming this is a question about
Polish.
>
I am convinced that the question can be fully answered entirely on the
basis of the semantics of C in the exact same way that the termination
status of the following functions can be answered entirely on the basis
of sufficient knowledge of the semantics of c.
>
*If you believe otherwise then I ask for you to please justify this*
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
   Infinite_Recursion();
}
>
int factorial(int n) // called with 5
{
   if (n >= 1)
     return n*factorial(n-1);
   else
     return 1;
}
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
>
>
This is possible with most languages so this isn't a question about C.
>
None-the-less the semantics of my code template does seem
to prove the result that I stated. I would not even be here
except for the people in the other forum that consistently
lie about this.
>
>
You're neither asking about a C- or C++ problem.
So use a proper newsgroup.
>
>
There is no other group that knows enough about the semantics of the
C programming language and there is no other group still alive that
knows enough about the semantics of programming languages.
>
>
comp.theory is the most apppropriate group.
>
>
They have proven to not be the right group because they have
consistently lied about this for two years.
 Maybe, but according to the topic this group fits.
*I AM GETTING NO WHERE WITH THEM ON THIS PAIR OF C FUNCTIONS*
D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own final
state at line 06 and halt because D correctly simulated by
H remains stuck in recursive simulation.
As soon as I get three people to sincerely concur then I
won't need these two groups any more.

>
It is trivial to see that for every H/D pair of the infinite
set of H/D pairs that match the below template that
>
D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own final
state at line 06 and halt because D correctly simulated by
H remains stuck in recursive simulation.
>
This provides the basis for simulating termination analyzer H to
correctly determine that the halting problem's counter-example
input D cannot possibly halt.
>
typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int D(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         H(D,D);
12         return 0;
13       }
>
>
 
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 May 24 * Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?136olcott
19 May 24 +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Richard Damon
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Sam
19 May 24 i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2olcott
19 May 24 i `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1jak
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?128Bonita Montero
19 May 24 i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?127olcott
19 May 24 i +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Richard Damon
20 May 24 i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?125Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?124olcott
20 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?54Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?53olcott
20 May 24 i   i +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?44Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?43olcott
20 May 24 i   i i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?42Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?41olcott
20 May 24 i   i i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?40Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?39olcott
20 May 24 i   i i     +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Richard Harnden
20 May 24 i   i i     i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?36Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i      `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?35olcott
20 May 24 i   i i       `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?34Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?13olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?12Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?11olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i  i `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?6Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i      `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i       `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?20Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i         `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?19olcott
20 May 24 i   i i          `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?18Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i           `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?17olcott
20 May 24 i   i i            `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?16Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i             `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?15olcott
20 May 24 i   i i              `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?14Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i               `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?13olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?12Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                 +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                 `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?10olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?9Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?8Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?7olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i  `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?8Fred. Zwarts
20 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?7olcott
20 May 24 i   i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Paavo Helde
20 May 24 i   i   i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
21 May 24 i   i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   i      `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?37wij
20 May 24 i   i+* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5olcott
20 May 24 i   ii`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4wij
20 May 24 i   ii `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
20 May 24 i   ii  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2wij
20 May 24 i   ii   `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
21 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?31Keith Thompson
21 May 24 i   i +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Keith Thompson
21 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?29olcott
21 May 24 i   i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?27Janis Papanagnou
21 May 24 i   i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?26olcott
21 May 24 i   i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?25Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i     `* Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?24olcott
21 May 24 i   i      `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?23Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i       `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?22olcott
21 May 24 i   i        `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?21Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i         `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?20olcott
21 May 24 i   i          `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?19Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i           `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?18olcott
22 May 24 i   i            +* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?7Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            i`* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?6olcott
22 May 24 i   i            i `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?5Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            i  `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?4olcott
22 May 24 i   i            i   `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            i    `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2olcott
22 May 24 i   i            i     `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i            `* D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation10olcott
22 May 24 i   i             +* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation8wij
22 May 24 i   i             i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]3olcott
22 May 24 i   i             ii`* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]2olcott
22 May 24 i   i             ii `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]1wij
22 May 24 i   i             i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation4olcott
23 May 24 i   i             i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation3Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 24 i   i             i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation2olcott
23 May 24 i   i             i   `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation1Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i             `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation1Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?32Sam
20 May 24 `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Marcel Mueller

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal