Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?

olcott writes:

On 5/23/2024 8:10 PM, Sam wrote:

olcott writes:
>

>
This is the worst chunk of code I've seen in at least fifteen years. It  shows a complete lack of understanding of fundamental principles of C and  C++.
>

>
It is the computer science of the Peter Linz halting
problem proof translated into C. This too is a template:

>
It's completely wrong. It suffers from a fundamental flaw of using an  inverse logical loop that makes its boolean logic produce an irrational  identity matrix.
>
The shown code is worthless. It'll never work. Try again, from step 1. Start  with the K&R book, beginning with Chapter 1.
>

Can we please get back to the C or do you really want
to stay off topic?

>
As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no

>
It is not syntactically invalid C, why lie about this?

Of course it is syntactically-invalid. No self-respecting C or C++ compiler  will accept the shown code, cut/pasted exactly as shown. Line numbers have  never been a part of either C or C++.
When was the last time you successfully compiled C or C++ code?