Re: Atomic caching of smart pointers

On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:50 +0300
Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> boringly babbled:

So, what do you think? Should I just use std::atomic<std::shared_ptr>
instead? Any other suggestions? Did I get the memory order parameters
right in compare_exchange_weak()?

Looks to me like you're simply protecting the pointers rather than the data
they're actually pointing to but I only skim read it.