Sujet : Re: Atomic caching of smart pointers
De : eesnimi (at) *nospam* osa.pri.ee (Paavo Helde)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++Date : 16. Sep 2024, 09:59:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vc8s1d$2okha$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16.09.2024 10:26,
Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:50 +0300
Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> boringly babbled:
So, what do you think? Should I just use std::atomic<std::shared_ptr>
instead? Any other suggestions? Did I get the memory order parameters
right in compare_exchange_weak()?
Looks to me like you're simply protecting the pointers rather than the data
they're actually pointing to but I only skim read it.
You are right, at the moment I am interested in protecting the pointers.
The pointed data will be immutable after initial creation (except for potential refcounter updates inside it, but the refcounters are atomic anyway, so no problems there).
Atomic caching of smart pointers
Re: Atomic caching of smart pointers